Posted 4/22/2012 1:59 am
You are correct, because she confess to the handraping so we know she was being raped with their hands, the quote "You can't imagine what they did to me" we know it was something other than handraping and groping. We can imagine what sexual acts are left, that was done to her. This leaves an all out multiple penis gangrape also an forced multiple oral raping with the possibility of foreign objects. The other things we can't imagine, would be pissing, spitting, masturbating or rubbing shit on her. Fucking her every hole I would imagine to be first, second to multiple blow jobs the rest would be pure humiliation after they were finish raping her.
Posted 4/22/2012 5:30 am
Lara Logan of CBS News apparently wanted her privacy respected following her sexual assault in Egypt. Yet prior to that she made some questionable statements regarding showing the dead bodies of American Troops. [And after her sexual assault, she continues making some questionable statements regarding American Troops (It doesnt really mean anything in Afghanistan if you bring charges or demote somebodys rank. No ones going to be hanging from a tree for this, and thats the kind of justice that theyre used to in Afghanistan," she said.)] So why is it that so-called journalists can demand a right to show the dead bodies of American Troops even as Im told that I must be outraged at photographs showing American Troops (and Afghanis) posing with the bodies of dead terrorists?
very well said: "people of low intelligence and poor upbringing."
But you know what I am thinking? Her husband probably heard everything that they did to her, everything that she had to do to play a long with them.... and he is probably thanking her for it millions of times.... she did not leave him without a wife (and, probably, what a wife!) and children without a mother (and, probably, what a mother!) WHen the children learn to understand any of it they will be infinitely greateful too.
And I just appload her. She is a very remarkable person, woman....
No I believe that this was planned a planned assault!If you notice her face was Not Injured! It was left so that while the filmed the assault her face was clear so no one can deny it was her. Also if the did kill her it would be a repeat of Shock and Awe in Baghdad. They sent a message attached to Lara's ass to stay out of our Business, as we all know now "Nothing" was done in retaliation for the Assault toward Egypt....NOTHING! And if they killed her there would have been a Military Response.REE you make it out that things are all fine, and I will beg to differ as There was a time Period that was needed to make sure Lara did not Contact Aids or some other type of Sexual Transmitted Disease! Then the Mental Flashbacks that would trigger more PTSD! So you want to paint a Picture of Tranquility and Norma
Well actually she MAY have BEEN hurt in the face very likely. But there was nothing broken. Now black eyes and swollen cheeks and maybe one or two broken teeth can be EASILY repaired no questions asked. Docs can fix that in four days easily and then she was at home and we do not know how she looked a) just after the assault b) after the hospital care in the US c) after a few days/one or two weeks after the assault while recuperating in her home.
That makes sense...i mean it is a good argument why she wasnt seriously injured especially in the easily recognizable parts of her body (face) I mean no broken bones? That is pretty hard to believe of an crazed crowd.
Right. Even worse...The US is thinking about supporting the Muslim Brotherhood Government soon to be installed in power.
REE, I am not picking on you at all, just want to add Common Sense to some thinking! As I said we get the picture that they want us to get, what we do not know is what is happening behind Closed Doors. Aids does not show up immediately and they my be Testing her monthly and that is not released to the Public, there is still the PTSD and there is also the fact that at this time there maybe No sex between her and her husband as of yet do to the PTSD yet. We do not know this and it is never reported either. There is so much we will never be told! It's easy to smile on the outside, but be torn apart on the Inside! She needs to be in the Public eye to show CBS that she is OK, but if she was OK she would have been oversea's reporting already! So with this it's clear she is far from over this, and as soon as she get's surrounded by a Group, she is going to freak!
Posted 4/22/2012 2:11 pm
Once they stripped Lara naked and many could put their hands on her, this was their centerfold come to life. Groping, touching, fingering and handraping was first and she admitted to this. Her surrender meant she turn her body over to them without the fighting and stop resisting, which allow them to rape her with penis, in the same holes they were handraping (they had been inside her holes already). Forcing oral rape, they had to force penises in her mouth, this was the only reason they hit and beat her, whipping her body along with pulling her hair until she also surrender to blow jobs. After raping every hole to a cum fill mess, the mob stop using their penis, that's when the other humiliations was done to her, because she was a mess and all her holes were filled up, she was cover from her hair and body in dirt and fluid. The mob had to clean her off to continue, the women in black saw her as a dirty, fluid cover mess, that's why the first thing they thought of, was to water her down and clean her off, they even threw water at the mob, who only wanted to clean her up for round 2.
While it is impossible to know what medical history LL had since the attack happened i am pretty sure it was fixed. AIDs...well. We just dont know. Very likely she got very lucky and nothing came out of it.
I do not think she has that much troubles in Groups...more precisely she may have problems with certain groups/crowds. Mixed crowds i don not believe to be a problem. Crowds consisting only of men? Yeah that may be a great problem. The problem with overseas reporting is that pretty much every job that would be offered to her would entail highest risk. So even if she is pretty much okay that does not mean she can just shrug the shoulders and go to Syria or South-Sudan.
Very probably true. But your account - forgive if I am mistaken - reads a little like a rape account of its own. Look this is a fantasy you are describing that may correspond to the facts. But for you it is a fantasy. You have to keep that in mind. And you have to try to separate reality from fantasy.
Posted 4/22/2012 3:00 pm : Edited 4/22/2012 3:12 pm
What Clarissa Ward said better not be an intentional dig at Ms. Logan. If it is, she's got a lot to answer for being a fledgling journalist insulting someone with twenty years of experience. It's bullshit. If this was any sort of commentary on Ms. Logan, she should be fired immediately. If not, if it's just some thoughtless comment with no consideration for how it could be taken, she's being careless and should hear about it. What a stupid thing to say in light of all that's happened in recent months. 140+ journalists attacked in Egypt (some killed) and... even the reporter who asked the question... what level of mental divergence do you have to be suffering from when you start talking about how tight jeans make you the story like this... when your boss just got raped? I don't understand.
Reviewing the footage from that night, Ms. Logan did have a low cut top showing through from beneath her unbuttoned jackets. I don't know what sort of pants she had on so no comment there. But, come on, she was not asking to be raped (not in any culture). This is not about how she was dressed. She was not attacked because her pants were 5% tighter than the girl next to her. A lot of women were wearing jeans and t-shirts with no head scarves that night in Tahrir Square. She got attacked because she's Lara Logan.
I don't agree. Even if the criticism was legitimate, she shouldn't have said something like that in light of what happened to her colleague (and wouldn't have if she had the proper respect for someone who has contributed a lot to the field she's just now entering). I think it shows contempt and shows a cocky attitude. She's young and thinks she's "the shit" but, yea, come back in eighteen years with no controversy and then give commentary on what mistakes you think were made by a distinguished colleague. It's a little rude.
I know a few different women who were gang raped at parties. A friend's daughter was gang raped at a party. It's pretty insane to think that you live in a community full of rapists. If one in four women are raped in their lifetime then one in four of the men you interact with have raped a woman. That's just insane.
I'll never understand men who feel insulted or taunted by the appearance of some cleavage. You'd think they would be grateful she's sharing her beauty. It's just some stupid way of casting blame. Just as many women are raped for being too prudish as women raped for being too "slutty" or whatever else. No matter what you do, a criminal will find a way to blame you for his batshit crazy actions.